Yet Another Atheist Blog

2007-10-19

Reality Check

Filed under: Bible, atheism, creationism, morality, science — stone1343 @ 2:17 am

The universe functions according to the laws of nature. There’s no evidence for any supernatural phenomena, nor any need for supernatural phenomena to explain how the universe works.

Science can’t completely explain how the universe works, and maybe never will. But it’s only through science that we will get the real answers.

Earth is a small planet orbiting a typical star in an immensely large galaxy, which is part of an unimaginably huge universe. There are likely millions or billions of planets in the universe, the vast majority of which are completely incapable of supporting life. That still leaves an unknown, possibly huge number of planets capable of sustaining life. There is nothing special about Earth, besides having the perfect conditions for life to evolve (and of course, being where we live).

The only reason we exist at all is that we were extremely lucky to have evolved here.

Evolution is science, creationism is myth. There’s no real debate among scientists about the validity of evolution, only the details of how it works. The only ones who reject evolution are the creationists, and only because it conflicts with their religion. Just because you don’t understand science doesn’t mean it’s wrong.

Creationism is willful ignorance. When you argue for teaching creationism in school, you are actively perpetuating your ignorance and misunderstanding of science on the next generation. (Denying the Holocaust or global warming, and 9/11 conspiracy theories are also willful ignorance.)

There’s nothing special about humans compared to other animals.

Humans have a built-in capacity for faith and morality. The fact that our brains can have religious experiences does not make them real.

We tend to believe what we’re taught by our parents, teachers, religious leaders and community. It becomes part of our world-view, and it’s difficult to change these beliefs. But that doesn’t mean these beliefs are true.

Most people belong to the religion they were raised in.

If you were born in a different place or time, it’s quite likely that you would believe in a different religion and god(s).

Most, if not all, cultures have had their own religion and god(s). In general, they are mutually exclusive, as in, they can’t all be right.

You may be totally convinced that your religion is the true one, but everyone else is just as convinced that theirs is true.

The majority of people alive today believe completely that your religion is false, whichever religion that may be.

There’s no supernatural credibility in ancient religions, which we now call “mythology”.

You may also agree with me that there’s no supernatural credibility in other world religions, or in their holy texts.

The Old Testament is nothing but a 2,000-year-old book of campfire stories from a bronze-age tribe of nomads living in the desert.

The New Testament is marketing material promoting a new leader (who may or may not have existed), plagiarized from many earlier deities.

The Bible reflects the culture and superstitions of the people who wrote it. They had no understanding of how the universe works, hence any science that they actually got right is purely coincidental.

There is some positive morality in the Bible, the rest of it is an abomination.

Like all other holy texts, the Bible has no credibility in any of its supernatural claims, including God, Jesus, heaven, angels, hell and Satan.

You can’t use the Bible to prove anything about the existence of supernatural phenomena.

There is no more supernatural credibility in Christianity than any other religion.

Religion was created by man to help answer “the big questions”. It’s a human institution, and as such, is capable of both good and evil.

Religion is tribal. If the Israelites had lost just one of the many genocidal battles documented in the Old Testament, their particular god would have perished with them and we would be worshipping an entirely different god (or gods).

Being tribal, religion is divisive and perpetuates an “us-versus-them” mentality. It helps you believe that everyone who doesn’t believe exactly as you do is going to hell.

Hell is an entirely unacceptable concept. It’s an invention of cruel, primitive, vindictive minds to enforce “correct” behaviour by fear and guilt.

If hell is the only thing keeping you from sinning, that makes you a morally weak person.

It’s absurd and insulting (to you) to claim that the Bible is the only source of morality.

The “ethic of reciprocity” (known in Christianity as the Golden Rule) can be considered the modern basis for right and wrong, especially when slightly re-phrased, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, if you were in their situation“. It’s found in most world religions.

You don’t need to be a member of any religion to live your life according to the Golden Rule.

Your particular “morality” is a combination of nature and nurture, just like everyone else who has ever lived. The fact that you can quote scripture to back up your opinion means nothing as the Bible is so famously ambiguous that you can use it to validate any position.

On the other hand, your religious beliefs and rituals basically amount to “culture”. They’re a product of your environment, they’re self-perpetuating when you pass them on to the next generation and they don’t rely on the actual existence of God, since faith is a virtue in itself.

Looking at religion as “culture” actually helps make some sense of the insanity. All the rules, superstitions, rituals, taboos, bigotry, hatred, closed-mindedness, oppression, genocide and anything else that you want to attribute to religion is really just part of being a member of a tribe in a competitive, brutal world.Like it or not, I think this is a pretty good summary of reality. I’m sure you’ll be tempted to turn it around and give me “your version of reality”, but remember it’s based on superstition, ignorance and a 2,000-year-old book of campfire stories.

5 Comments »

  1. Great post.

    To add to the beginning of your post about science explaining things, I always look at the ID/Creationist reponse to an eye evolving as a failure of the imagination. The idea that the eye (or human brain, or mammals from fishlike ancestors etc) is too improbable to have evolved by natural selection merely represents that the creationist cannot imagine it happening, therefore that is not how it happened.

    There are two failures of imagination happening. One is failing to imagine one’s own conceptual capacity, nothing to be ashamed of, but important to recognise. The other is the failure to imagine the actual evolutionary events that led to the eye; again, nothing to be ashamed of, but something to be open-minded toward as scientists tease the answers out.

    Nice to see you on the blogroll.
    -Glendon Mellow
    The Flying Trilobite

    Comment by The Flying Trilobite, fcd — 2007-11-30 @ 1:48 pm

  2. Your statement: “Humans have a built-in capacity for faith and morality. The fact that our brains can have religious experiences does not make them real.” was the last nail in the coffin of my theism. Thank you.

    wiz

    Comment by Elizabeth Bond — 2008-08-25 @ 5:23 pm

  3. Wow, I’m glad I helped. Best wishes…

    Comment by stone1343 — 2008-09-10 @ 8:37 pm

  4. A lot of simplistic statements. Sounds like textbook knowledge without the experience.
    You have just attempted to discount all spiritual experiences, demon possessions, and miracle workers. You are saying that the only thing to life is what we can see.
    There is no biological or scientific “proof” of love that can be measured. Does love not exist?

    Comment by ster — 2008-11-26 @ 4:34 pm

  5. Ster, thank you for reading and commenting.

    About my statements being simplistic, I could’ve written much more, but my intent was to make a series of statements, not debate or try to prove each one. Anytime I go into more detail, I never get through – it’s a shortcoming of mine, I’m not a natural writer.

    As for supernatural phenomena, I believe people do have spiritual experiences, that they can be extremely powerful and meaningful, but that they are somehow a product of the brain, in ways we don’t yet understand. It is real to the person, but not externally real, in the sense that another observer in the room would experience it the same way or that the experience really occurred. It’s just a product of our brain, very little of which we understand yet.

    “Demonic possession” is not something I have fully thought-out ideas about, because it’s not an idea I encounter very often. I’d have to say I would consider it a type of spiritual experience that convinces Person A that Person B is “possessed” and that it’s a very serious and dangerous malfunction in A’s brain and B needs to be protected from A. I think the idea of demonic possession has led to a lot of people suffering and dying needlessly, case in point, the child “witches” currently being persecuted in Africa.

    Love is also a thought in somebody’s brain (and I definitely do believe in love, I’m married and have two children that I love with all my heart, no to mention my other family and friends). But I’m sure even “love” could be observed by an MRI. A scientist could show his subject pictures of people, some totally unknown, others known but relatively neutral and still others people he/she loves very much, and I’m sure you’d see areas of the brain active in recognizing people you know and other areas of the brain active for the strong emotion of love.

    In fact, I have no doubt that other types of spiritual experiences could be observed by MRI, if you were looking at the right time.

    I guess it boils down to what is “real”. That’s a philosophical debate that I’m not interested in getting into. My thoughts are real enough to me, and if you’ve seen Jesus and he tells you to love your fellow man, that’s great, I’m thrilled for you, no sarcasm intended. But if he’s telling you to kill somebody because they’re possessed, you should get yourself locked up for that person’s protection. I’m using the general “you”, as in “someone”, I’m not accusing you personally of anything or mocking you or anything, so please don’t ascribe motives to me that aren’t intended.

    On the other hand, for something to be a miracle, by definition, it would have to be something that actually occurred in the real world, not just in someone’s mind. I am unconvinced of a single scientifically-verifiable miracle. Why won’t God heal amputees?

    One last thing – I’m happy to discuss this forever, but I don’t need to be converted or preached to. This is my blog, where I publish my opinions. I don’t believe in God, hell, Satan, demons or angels, but I know I’m a thoroughly good person who truly tries to do unto others as I would have them do unto me if I were in their situation. Respect that and you’ll be respected in return. Don’t tell me I’m going to hell because I don’t believe in hell, it’s just a cop-out so you can think you won the debate. Sorry if it seems I’m assuming something about you, but that’s been my experience with people who come knocking on my door. Treat it as a challenge to your worldview – I’m an atheist and I’m every bit as good a person as you are (actually, I prefer to be called a “humanist” because it’s not so loaded with negative connotations and unlike a lot of atheists, I do care somewhat what you think of me. I’d like to think that you respect my views just as I do yours, but if not, that’s between you and your God).

    Comment by stone1343 — 2008-11-26 @ 6:57 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.