<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes when you&#8217;re stumbling, you step in a pile of crap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yetanotheratheistblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/sometimes-when-youre-stumbling-you-step-in-a-pile-of-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yetanotheratheistblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/sometimes-when-youre-stumbling-you-step-in-a-pile-of-crap/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stone1343</title>
		<link>http://yetanotheratheistblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/sometimes-when-youre-stumbling-you-step-in-a-pile-of-crap/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>stone1343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yetanotheratheistblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/sometimes-when-youre-stumbling-you-step-in-a-pile-of-crap/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>chiz, thanks for the comment. You&#039;re made me realize that I was probably unnecessarily harsh. I was just angry at the whole anti-GW lobby. BTW, I found the interstellar dust cloud article interesting, that was something that I hadn&#039;t read about yet.

I don&#039;t want to get an argument with you either, because whatever the reason, we&#039;re still basically on the same side, but the Gristmill link I provided ( http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics ) has a link specifically covering warming on Mars &amp; Pluto ( http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/222712/69 ).

Anyway, all I&#039;m saying is that a huge amount of science has been done, and there&#039;s an overwhelming consensus among scientists that it&#039;s caused by us. That doesn&#039;t mean all scientists agree, and it certainly doesn&#039;t mean all non-scientists need to agree. I just get angry at the people who say it&#039;s not happening but don&#039;t have any science to back up their position, such as this guy ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119680478212413517.html ), who just seems too opposed to Al Gore to ever accept the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chiz, thanks for the comment. You&#8217;re made me realize that I was probably unnecessarily harsh. I was just angry at the whole anti-GW lobby. BTW, I found the interstellar dust cloud article interesting, that was something that I hadn&#8217;t read about yet.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to get an argument with you either, because whatever the reason, we&#8217;re still basically on the same side, but the Gristmill link I provided ( <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics</a> ) has a link specifically covering warming on Mars &amp; Pluto ( <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/222712/69" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/222712/69</a> ).</p>
<p>Anyway, all I&#8217;m saying is that a huge amount of science has been done, and there&#8217;s an overwhelming consensus among scientists that it&#8217;s caused by us. That doesn&#8217;t mean all scientists agree, and it certainly doesn&#8217;t mean all non-scientists need to agree. I just get angry at the people who say it&#8217;s not happening but don&#8217;t have any science to back up their position, such as this guy ( <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119680478212413517.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119680478212413517.html</a> ), who just seems too opposed to Al Gore to ever accept the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiz</title>
		<link>http://yetanotheratheistblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/sometimes-when-youre-stumbling-you-step-in-a-pile-of-crap/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>chiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yetanotheratheistblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/sometimes-when-youre-stumbling-you-step-in-a-pile-of-crap/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Man made global warming is nothing more than a politician&#039;s dividing tool.  I am an atheist who HAS done some &#039;real&#039; studying on the matter and after years of study and research, I have come to one conclusion.  It&#039;s bull.  

The climate IS changing and there IS global warming, but it is not due to the actions of humankind.  Are we &#039;helping&#039; the matter?  No.  Do we need to cut back?  Yes.  Something should be done b/c it is wrong and unhealthy(to us and wildlife), not b/c we are &#039;destroying&#039; the planet.  I agree that this may be one of the biggest challenges mankind has ever faced and I also agree that we need to focus on solving the problem, but I think our views of why and how are a little different.

Basically, our entire solar system is undergoing changes.  Even PLUTO is experiencing extreme temperature changes.  Pluto has undergone a 300% increase in atmospheric pressure, which is the highest increase of any planet, and it is increasing as Pluto orbits AWAY from the Sun.  

These links only touch on two subjects; our solar system&#039;s temperature changes and a non-biased explaination of what you discussed in your article.  I don&#039;t wish to debate the finer points of G.W. with you b/c it is an endless debate that has endless sources for each point of view.  I have only responded b/c you have &#039;shelved&#039; all man made global warmer &#039;deniers&#039; together.  We are not ALL idiots and many of us HAVE done our research.  YEARS OF IT.

Is this information &#039;real&#039; enough for you?

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-131

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/odyssey/newsroom/pressreleases/20031208a.html

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/newsroom/20050920a.html

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6985/abs/nature02470.html

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2002/pluto.html

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1697309.htm

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...223..589V

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=12353

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/medieval_marsh.html

There aren&#039;t too many Yukons on Mars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man made global warming is nothing more than a politician&#8217;s dividing tool.  I am an atheist who HAS done some &#8216;real&#8217; studying on the matter and after years of study and research, I have come to one conclusion.  It&#8217;s bull.  </p>
<p>The climate IS changing and there IS global warming, but it is not due to the actions of humankind.  Are we &#8216;helping&#8217; the matter?  No.  Do we need to cut back?  Yes.  Something should be done b/c it is wrong and unhealthy(to us and wildlife), not b/c we are &#8216;destroying&#8217; the planet.  I agree that this may be one of the biggest challenges mankind has ever faced and I also agree that we need to focus on solving the problem, but I think our views of why and how are a little different.</p>
<p>Basically, our entire solar system is undergoing changes.  Even PLUTO is experiencing extreme temperature changes.  Pluto has undergone a 300% increase in atmospheric pressure, which is the highest increase of any planet, and it is increasing as Pluto orbits AWAY from the Sun.  </p>
<p>These links only touch on two subjects; our solar system&#8217;s temperature changes and a non-biased explaination of what you discussed in your article.  I don&#8217;t wish to debate the finer points of G.W. with you b/c it is an endless debate that has endless sources for each point of view.  I have only responded b/c you have &#8217;shelved&#8217; all man made global warmer &#8216;deniers&#8217; together.  We are not ALL idiots and many of us HAVE done our research.  YEARS OF IT.</p>
<p>Is this information &#8216;real&#8217; enough for you?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-131" rel="nofollow">http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-131</a></p>
<p><a href="http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/odyssey/newsroom/pressreleases/20031208a.html" rel="nofollow">http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/odyssey/newsroom/pressreleases/20031208a.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/newsroom/20050920a.html" rel="nofollow">http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/newsroom/20050920a.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6985/abs/nature02470.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v428/n6985/abs/nature02470.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2002/pluto.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2002/pluto.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1697309.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1697309.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...223..589V" rel="nofollow">http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ&#8230;223..589V</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=12353" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=12353</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/medieval_marsh.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/medieval_marsh.html</a></p>
<p>There aren&#8217;t too many Yukons on Mars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
